<< Back to Summary 
Do you feel that your EMR system is of benefit to your practice efficiency and was it worth the cost of purchase and maintenance?
#Response DateOther (please specify)
1.6/11/2008 11:42:00 AMnot in practice
2.6/11/2008 11:46:00 AMna
3.6/11/2008 12:41:00 PMNA
4.6/11/2008 12:50:00 PMI don't use EMR
5.6/11/2008 1:27:00 PMVery useful at VA. Unaware of cost.
6.6/11/2008 1:55:00 PMwe are looking at implementing on ebecause we believe it will better aquality of care and speed of delivery and communication between providers
7.6/11/2008 1:58:00 PMNot applicable
8.6/11/2008 1:59:00 PMNot applicable
9.6/11/2008 2:01:00 PMdon't use one
10.6/11/2008 2:15:00 PMnot applicable
11.6/11/2008 3:10:00 PMn/a
12.6/11/2008 3:28:00 PMn/a
13.6/11/2008 5:14:00 PMThe cost was too high but it is beneficial
14.6/11/2008 5:25:00 PMOur current system is very old.
15.6/11/2008 6:20:00 PMRetired
16.6/11/2008 7:16:00 PMDoes not apply
17.6/12/2008 12:58:00 AMEfficiency will be improved greatly, but at too much cost.
18.6/12/2008 3:19:00 AMn/a
19.6/12/2008 3:08:00 PMN/A
20.6/12/2008 5:47:00 PMNA
21.6/13/2008 2:22:00 AMna
22.6/13/2008 8:48:00 AMDo not use
23.6/14/2008 7:11:00 PMNote that there are a wide range of 'versions' of the EMR - i.e., it is not a single standardized 'product.' Most practicing physicians and legislators have a very poor understanding of medical/healthcare informatics and computational strategies that support the delivery of healthcare
24.6/18/2008 12:55:00 AMNot applicable
25.6/18/2008 6:34:00 PMn/a
26.6/23/2008 12:39:00 PMnot applicable
27.6/23/2008 1:01:00 PMI work for the VA so it didn't cost me anything and it is among the best systems I've worked with anywhere.
28.6/23/2008 1:51:00 PMnot sure
29.6/23/2008 3:40:00 PMIt is better patient care but much less efficient.
30.6/23/2008 9:54:00 PMWorth the cost is another question.
31.6/25/2008 2:28:00 AMforced on me at two separate sites, great impediment to efficiency
32.6/25/2008 4:11:00 PMNot Yet