ÿþ<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Comment Summary</title><link media="all" href="css/Export.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" /></head><body style="margin-left: 15px; margin-right: 15px; margin-top: 15px"><a onfocus="blur();" href="SurveySummary.html" class="NormBtn" />&nbsp;<< Back to Summary&nbsp;</a><div style="margin-top: 15px"><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" border="0"><thead><tr><th class="hdr" colspan="3">At the recent American College of Cardiology meeting in late March 2008, an expert panel of cardiologists determined that the ENHANCE study put Vytorin and Zetia in a bad light, and recommended that doctors go back to prescribing statins alone. Here is a media summary of that: http://www.cnbc.com/id/23871395. As a result of this panel's recommendations in late March 2008, what have you done?</th></tr></thead><thead><tr><th class="hdr dflt">#</th><th class="hdr dflt">Response Date</th><th class="hdr dflt" style="width:99%;">Other (please specify)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/22/2008 6:09:00 PM</td><td>Most ACC 'experts' are not any more 'expert' than other cardiologists.</td></tr><tr><td>2.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/22/2008 6:37:00 PM</td><td>See my answer to #7 above</td></tr><tr><td>3.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/22/2008 7:56:00 PM</td><td>I have decrease prescriptions for Vytorin, but not for Zetia</td></tr><tr><td>4.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/22/2008 10:03:00 PM</td><td>no change</td></tr><tr><td>5.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/23/2008 5:23:00 AM</td><td>I have stopped prescribing Vytorin</td></tr><tr><td>6.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/23/2008 10:11:00 AM</td><td>Never prescribed in the first place.</td></tr><tr><td>7.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/23/2008 1:35:00 PM</td><td>The ACC panel was an embarassment to the ACC. It was NOT a scientific discussion, it was a diatrribe by one member who attempted to thrust his strong opinions on all. It was a great diservice to the cardiology community and resulted in unecessarily scaring many patients.</td></tr><tr><td>8.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/23/2008 2:37:00 PM</td><td>I did not prescribe Vytorin, but Zetia for statin intolerance</td></tr><tr><td>9.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/23/2008 4:21:00 PM</td><td>There have not been enough situations to make a generalised answer</td></tr><tr><td>10.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/24/2008 4:46:00 AM</td><td>i have never started vytorin</td></tr><tr><td>11.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/24/2008 1:58:00 PM</td><td>Never used Vytorin</td></tr><tr><td>12.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/25/2008 12:18:00 AM</td><td>I did not use Zetia much as there are no outcome data. Statins work!</td></tr><tr><td>13.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">4/27/2008 9:11:00 PM</td><td>I didn't prescribe it prior, anyway</td></tr><tr><td>14.</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">5/2/2008 1:52:00 AM</td><td>the ACC expert panel was NEITHER expert nor a panel! it was a one doc polemic with little scientific justification</td></tr></tbody></table></div></body></html>