| 1. | 1/30/2008 9:31:00 PM | unsure |
| 2. | 1/30/2008 9:33:00 PM | unsure |
| 3. | 1/30/2008 10:08:00 PM | But i don't really know |
| 4. | 1/30/2008 10:24:00 PM | perhaps |
| 5. | 1/31/2008 12:47:00 AM | Not sure. |
| 6. | 1/31/2008 3:19:00 AM | I hope not. |
| 7. | 1/31/2008 3:59:00 PM | I don't know |
| 8. | 1/31/2008 4:51:00 PM | I would hope not. But sheesh, the Merck/Vioxx story doesn't help. |
| 9. | 1/31/2008 8:50:00 PM | not sure |
| 10. | 1/31/2008 8:53:00 PM | not sure |
| 11. | 2/1/2008 3:19:00 AM | Maybe |
| 12. | 2/1/2008 5:42:00 PM | Maybe - this is a business/marketing strategy which does not effect the medical care that I provide and that cardiologists should be independent from |
| 13. | 2/2/2008 2:14:00 PM | To MSD and SP delaying the results of a study deliberately would not affect revenues in the long term, and would give bad press. People should avoid believing in conspiracy theories |
| 14. | 2/3/2008 8:35:00 PM | Uncertain. "Prominent" = "Industry Influenced" |
| 15. | 2/4/2008 2:00:00 PM | I believe they wanted to analyze the data more completely, to better understand the neutral result. |